The Golfchick

That chick blabbing about anything golf related.

Category: FedEx Cup

Super Excited for the Fedex Cup. Wait…

I had that entirely wrong. I’m not at all excited for the Fedex Cup. Here’s why…

The final event, The TOUR Championship is being played this week, and will determine the winner of the Cup. If one of the top 5 guys wins, he wins the cup. Beyond that,  I need someone else to run the numbers for me and provide scenarios. What’s the fun in that? Do you think the players just trust the experts to know where they stand? It must be even more frustrating for them. For example, here is the scenario required for Luke Donald to win (produced by the PGA Tour and published in the Fedex Cup breakdown over at golfweek.com):

Now, just to make things even MORE confusing, take a look at the asterisks. Does that mean if those things happen, Luke will be in a tie for the Fedex Cup, and if so, with whom? Or, does that mean the results of the Fedex Cup have to be in before we can determine if he wins the Fedex Cup? My head hurts.

I’ve said Fedex Cup too many Fedexing times.

Remember, all these complicated calculations that we leave in the hands of the experts (and the seemingly arbitrary amount of points they earned in each event that put them in their current rank were determined by the same people) also decide the top 125 players to get their Tour Cards for 2013. Seems to me the Authority have a little too much power in this process. Sure hope they don’t have favorites!

In the spirit of offering solutions rather than just complaints, here’s my own stupid idea I proposed back in 2007.

What do you think of the whole Fedex Cup thing?

Next post.

FedEx Cup changes all about the money. Plus, my own points proposal.

It seems the fans weren’t the only ones less than thrilled about the deferred payment and the lack of excitement it generated for the FedEx Cup playoffs. The PGA Tour announced some changes for 2008 and beyond. Yes, there will still be some deferred payments, but only a percentage.

Money money money money… MONEY – sing it!

Out of the $35 million dollar bonus pool, $10 million still goes to the winner, with $9 million of that in cash and $1 million into the tax-deferred retirement account.The way I understand it, another $6.5 million in cash will be split between the next 9 top finishers and the remaining $18.5 million will be split up into the retirement accounts of the top 149 players behind the winner (including the aforementioned 9 cash prize winners).

Um, okay… I guess that makes it a little bit more exciting for the fans. And more incentive for the players to be in the top 10 if they want any cash. And since the 150th player on the money list this year has already made almost $500K, it’s not like they’re hurting for pocket change. (Following my habit of reporting disparity in the Tours, the 150th player on the LPGA money list made an appalling $12,798. Hrmph. Seriously, that’s not even a yearly mortgage payment.) But I digress, as usual.

Other changes

They also made some changes to the schedule, primarily to allow room for the players to compete in the Ryder Cup. I’m sure it’s also to position the tournaments better for advertisers, ratings and sponsors (again money related).

Personally, I think the real problem is with the points and the structure of the whole thing. Apparently, the powers that be disagree:

“…the Policy Board did not feel the need to make fundamental changes to the overall structure of the competition. Accordingly, no changes have been made in the points distribution in the PGA TOUR Regular Season.”

The good news is they’re still evaluating the points system for the playoffs as they relate to reseeding and distribution. Excellent. Let’s hope they don’t decide it ain’t broke. Unfortunately, they’re only considering feedback from the membership and the PAC, not random golfchicks or bloggers. Incidently, I’m not sure what the PAC even is. Is that the same as the Policy Board? Player’s Advocacy Committee? Policy Assessment Committee? Perfunctory and Aimless Courtesy? Puppets And Commissioners? Perfectly Absurd Council? I better stop now before I can’t.

Anyway… if a PGA or PAC member is looking for ideas, perhaps they’ll check around the interweb. It is in that hope and spirit that I offer my own suggestion. I complained about the FedEx Cup, so it’s only fair I try to offer a solution.

FixedUp CupThe Golfchick points proposal:

First, when the reseeding occurs, let it be an actual RESET. To Zero points. Limit the playoffs to, say, the top 60 players from the regular season. If you really want 120, that’s fine, too. This points system will work fine to eliminate players along the way. Now, like the marketing says, let’s really make EVERY SHOT COUNT.

Side note: Check it out – my FixedUp Cup logo even has a subliminal arrow kinda like the FedEx one. :)

Let’s break it down

Players don’t get points for where they place on the leaderboard except in relation to how they got there. Yes, every hole, every good shot:

  • 1 point awarded for a fairway hit.
  • 1 point awarded for a green hit (in regulation with a par score)
  • 1 point awarded for a birdie
  • 1 point awarded for an eagle (plus the birdie point)
  • 1 point awarded for a double eagle (plus the birdie and eagle points)

Par 3s: Worth a maximum of 3 points (for an ace/eagle). Green hit with birdie: 2 points. Green missed with birdie: 1 point. Green hit with par: 1 point. Green missed with par: 0 points.

Par 4s: Worth a maximum of 5 points (for an ace/double eagle – yes, they get the fairway and green points). Drive the green, make the putt for an eagle: 4 points. Hit the fairway and hole out for eagle: 4 points. Miss the fairway and hole out for eagle: 3 points. Hit the fairway and the green and make the putt for birdie: 3 points. Fairway and green hit for par: 2 points. Fairway hit, green missed, hole out for birdie: 2 points. Fairway missed, green hit with birdie: 2 points. Fairway missed, green missed, hole out for birdie: 1 point.

Par 5s: Worth a maximum of 5 points (for a double eagle – fairway+green+birdie+eagle+double eagle). Hitting the green in two only increases points if converted. Fairway hit, green hit, eagle: 4 points. Fairway hit, green missed, eagle: 3 points. Fairway missed, green hit, eagle: 3 points. Fairway hit, green hit, birdie: 3 points. Fairway missed, green missed, eagle: 2 points. Fairway missed, green missed, birdie: 1 point.

So you see how this can get exciting? Players will be rewarded for hitting fairways and greens but can still make up points by holing out. We might see some strategy changes. Just look at the par 5: A ho-hum birdie is worth the same as an eagle if you missed the fairway. Same with the par 4s: A ho-hum par is worth the same as a birdie if you missed the fairway. Every shot really counts and the projections would be a lot more fun this way, too.

There – that’s my contribution. Feel free to use my points system. I’d appreciate some consideration when you’re naming it, though. :)

Next post.


FedEx Cup: Success? Tiger Woods: Sick.

23 under? REALLY? That’s the golf course we want them to play for the finals of the first ever Fedex Cup?

Sure, that was only Tiger, and it’s not like he’s human or something, but the actual men in the field laid waste to the course as well a mere 8 strokes behind that. Yes, mere. Tiger’s ability is just sick, so it’s not fair to compare other golfers to him.

Of course he won the FedEx Cup. And the Tour Championship. And Player of the Year. With authority. It wouldn’t seem right to have any of those titles go to anyone other than the world’s best golfer ever. So in that respect, the FedEx Cup was a success. I know a lot of folks were rooting for Stricker to win so the $10 million bonus would mean something, and at least he earned himself the $3M second place annuity. That’ll be some decent retirement money at any percentage rate. But let’s face it – if Tiger “sat on his laurels” and decided not to win, the Fedex Cup would have been criticized for not delivering the true champion. It would have been weird to have the Tour Championship trophy go to one guy, the Fedex Cup to another and the Player of the Year to yet another. Weird and wrong.

The Fedex Cup will continue to be criticized for its other problems – like the fact that the winner only had to play in 3 out of 4 playoff events (and could have done it in two), and the points system, and the schedule, and the final golf course, to name a few. But if nothing else, at least the right man being won.

Tiger Woods Fedex Cup

Is this a human drinking glass?

Next post.

How the FedEx do these Playoff points work???

Okay, I haven’t paid that much attention to the FedEx Cup from the start so I’m a little behind, but I can’t be the only one!

I remember hearing or reading that when the FedEx Cup Playoffs began the points would reset. Silly me, I thought that meant to ZERO. Isn’t that a reset? I also remember that there are eliminations in each playoff tournament and only the top however many will advance to the next round. So, when I found out Tiger was skipping the first event, I thought he was essentially shrugging off forfeiting his chance at the FedEx Cup since he wouldn’t earn any points and would be eliminated. It turns out that after the completion of the first event, Tiger is fourth in the standings. How the fedex did that happen?

I just had to look it up, didn’t I?

Until now, I hadn’t taken any time to look any of this up but I always read a lot of golf news and opinions and what I’ve seen on the points system is so bogged down and confusing I tend to just skim over it. I just took a look at the “About the FedEx Cup” page on PGATOUR.com and literally shook my head and made that bleuhhbuhluhbuhluh noise. Of course, the reset wasn’t to zero, but players were seeded based on their performance during the “regular season” and reset with a different point total than what they had. Of course. Why play all season just make it to the playoffs? There has to be seeding. Without it, the top players would have to play in all the playoff events to avoid elimination and I’m sure they didn’t want that.

*Side thought* I wonder – if my Anaheim Angels of Los Angeles Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim win enough games in September, can they skip the Division Series and go straight to the League Championship Series? Ah, the leisure of being a baseball fan: the most difficult thing to figure out is the magic number and home-field advantage. *End side thought*

Still, they got me – I couldn’t resist clicking on the “Fan Guide” link to find out if there was a simple way for me to understand it all. There isn’t.

Watch and learn?

I spent most of my golf watching time this weekend on the Safeway Classic and the US Amateur, but I managed to TiVo my way through some of the Barclays on Sunday to try to get an idea about how the wholefedex cup FedEx Cup playoff thing was working. They had a lot of graphics with projections like “if he makes this par putt, he’ll be at 102nd in the rankings… if he misses it but makes the bogey putt, he’ll be at 116th”… and on and on. Maybe that kind of stuff will get more exciting the further into the playoffs we get, but for now? Yawn. Double yawn for having to rely on behind-the-scenes statisticians figure it out and the production team to air it.

As the field narrows and if the points gap gets wider, it might be easier to predict parts of it ourselves. Something like “For Vijay to have a fedexing chance at winning the cup, he must win at the BMW and the top three guys need to finish at 5th or lower.” It’s easy to get excited about playoffs when they’re easily understood: if team A wins a game here and team B wins a game there, they will face each other in the championship; if Team C gets a touchdown and a safety and Team D scores two field goals, I win the pool. Hey, maybe we need a FedEx Cup pool!

Predictions aside, there’s also the trouble of possibly having two winners at the final – the winner of the tournament (hooray!) and the winner of the Cup, who finishes 10th in the event but has more points than anyone else (polite golf clap).

fucked up cup logo

I want to get excited about the FedEx Cup. I really do! But even the prize is confusing. I’m not a financial analyst and if I won $10 million in the lottery, I would need someone else to manage it for me. I’m one of the dumb-dumbs in the “if I made less money I’d take home more” tax bracket. I don’t understand tax shelters for multi-millionaires or how the FedEx Cup $10M annuity could entice Tiger Woods when he can make that in cash for an appearance fee. Frankly, I really don’t think I want it explained to me, either. Though I usually enjoy rooting for Tiger – or at least don’t mind when he wins -I think I’d rather just root for some obscure player to win the Cup, which might just be possible the way this thing works. Plus, that coincides nicely with the one thing that truly is exciting about this system, at least for those obscure players: Finish in that top 30 in FedEx Cup points and earn exemption for the next season. That’s gotta be less stressful than Q-School!

The PGA TOUR Playoffs for the FedEx Cup will change the way you watch golf and produce a true PGA Tour champion.” That’s their tag line. Will I glaze over and start to drool as I watch golf? Will the true PGA Tour champion be the best golfer on Tour?

The most exciting thing about the FedEx Cup playoffs for me right now is whether or not the FedEx Cup playoffs will get exciting. If not, at least I’ll have a new swear word. Stop. I. Can’t. Stand. The. Giddiness.

Next post.

© 2024 The Golfchick

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑