The Golfchick

That chick blabbing about anything golf related.

Category: Pro Golf And Golfer Commentary (page 3 of 7)

Ridiculous Rory misses the mark at The Masters

I know, I know… The Masters is still going on and is engaging as all get out with Tiger making a charge today, the first day’s leader (Justin Rose) plummeting to near the bottom of the leaderboard, and 3 players at the top of the leaderboard each with three solid rounds under par. And what do I write about? Ridiculous Rory Sabbatini.

He missed the cut – so much for “breaking the curse” after winning the par 3 contest. Fortunately, that means we don’t get treated to a weekend of ridiculous belt buckles. Yesterday’s gem not only had no place at Augusta, it has no place on Rory. I’m sorry, I just think he’s incapable of pulling off this “style” he’s been attempting. His entire persona seems affected, and his choice in apparel seems out of place on him. Geoff Shackelford made a good call back at Riviera: Rory: Liberace called, he wants his belt buckle back.

Lord knows I’m no fashionista, but I like to think I know what I can pull off and what I can’t. Rory looks as ridiculous in his piped trousers, loud colors, flashy belt buckles and tiny visors as I would in booty shorts and knee socks, and a cocky strut doesn’t change that for either of us. I could stuff a potato into a G.I. Joe outfit, name him Paolo, give him a mysterious back-story and a sympathetic and intriguing character image, and he’d still look like a spud in doll’s combat clothes.

Whether his duds are his own choices or if someone else is dressing him (I find that hard to believe), it certainly has gotten him attention. If that was the whole point, congratulations. But if he wanted that attention to be positive – another missed cut.

Next post.

Pro golf in the Caribbean

Here’s a phrase I don’t use every day: I’m really excited to watch the Champions Tour this weekend.

Why? They’re playing at my happy place, Punta Espada Golf Course at Cap Cana. I absolutely LOVE this golf course and seeing it in play by the seniors is going to be wonderful. If watching it on television is the closest you can get for now as well, I highly recommend checking it out.

I had to amend my TiVo to-do list, as my PGA “wish list” was picking up the regular PGA Tour as well as the European Tour above the Champions since they start earlier.

It’s on The Golf Channel at the following times:
Friday: 1 PM – 3 PM EST
Saturday and Sunday: 1 PM – 4 PM EST

I shot a video at this course when I played there a couple years ago. You can see it here. And here is my original post about my experience there.

Next post.

Why don’t the men promote their sexiness?

Whether you like it, hate it, or feel indifferent, many professional female golfers promote their sexiness on their respective tours. And the LPGA certainly doesn’t seem to discourage it.

So why don’t the men do it? Don’t they realize they have many fans attracted to men? There are some seriously sexy players on the PGA Tour, but we just don’t seem to hear too much about that. Sure, we’ll get a rare scantily clad image, but I bet they’re not regarded well by their peers. Ian Poulter’s recent nude photo had its share of negative press. Frankly, while I don’t mind that kind of exposure, I find some of them extremely sexy while fully clothed on the golf course.

The golfers who do get some press about their sexiness are predictable choices, like Adam Scott and Camilo Villegas. Watching the final round of the Zurich Classic of New Orleans this weekend, I couldn’t help but notice a couple others. It doesn’t seem so long ago that I would have been gaga over 26-year old Andres Romero, who sat casually yawning in the clubhouse checking out his i-tunes library on a laptop while waiting to see if he’d be faced with a playoff. Instead, I was gaga over Peter Lonard, the 40-year old on his way in, threatening to be the playoff contender. Admittedly, I haven’t seen too much of him, so I had to wait until he was on 18 and removed his cap to even know if there was hair under there (there is), but I didn’t care. There could be a slightly Costner-esque appeal there, but he just looks like the quintessential golfer to me, and in my mind, that’s sexy. But you won’t see him getting any steamy press. Except, I guess, for here on this blog. If you can call this “press.”

Dear Peter, I’m sorry you didn’t force the playoff. Not only for a chance at winning, but so that I could see more of you. I hope to see more of you atop the … leaderboard in the future, since we all know you won’t get camera time if you’re not.

Next post.

Lorena relegates Annika to Phil Mickelson status

Annika Sorenstam had a great start to the season with her 70th win at Turtle Bay. She hung in there to take 4th place at the Fields Open, 4 shots behind winner Paula Creamer.

Then Lorena Ochoa began her 2008 season with an authoritative “Not so fast, Annika” performance in stormy Singapore at the HSBC Women’s Champions. Oh, Annika secured a solo second place, but at 11 strokes behind Lorena’s -20, it seemed more like second fiddle. It’s just one tournament and I would love to see some closer races and some more Annika wins, but for now it sure seems like Annika : Lorena :: Phil : Tiger.

However, Annika set the standard for excellence in women’s golf. And while Lorena might notch some wins in individual tournaments near the end of Annika’s career, she’s going to need an awfully long ball retriever to vault the pole set so high by Sorenstam herself. For all we know, she may not have plans for a lengthy enough career to get there. Either way, this should be a year of great golf on the LPGA Tour.

Which brings me to my Gripe of the Post (I seem to be having a GOP quite frequently these days, no?):

After a full week and not catching any of the early telecasts, I was so looking forward to settling down to bloop through at least a couple hours of coverage for the final round on my DVR. I had been tracking the scores so I already knew it was a blowout, so I summarily deleted the early rounds from my playlist and eagerly started up Sunday’s final. What a mess. First, there was only an hour of coverage. An HOUR! Woohoo… we got to see the leaders play a few holes and we saw the groups ahead of them play a few shots while the leaders waited to play. With slow play and rain delays, it was an 8+ hour round of golf! That’s all they could bring us? Then there was the cheesy music as they transitioned to and from advertisements. With all that waiting around time, couldn’t The Golf Channel have assembled a better program to intersperse with the “live” play? Nope.
Plus, I don’t know how much to blame on the weather, but I’ve seen much better pictures from other poor-weather events. We were treated to a gray, misty, blurry picture with terrible sound, dull color, and lackluster commentary. Is that any way to encourage viewership? It certainly didn’t do justice to the field of vibrant, colorful, youthful players, who were effectively washed out.

The ladies are giving us great golf and I want better coverage of it. And I would think the LPGA would want better, not to mention the sponsors.

Golly, the GOP became longer than the actual topic. I shall look inward.

Next post.

Tiger’s Dominance Is All About His Mental Game

Yes, it’s another post about Tiger Woods. I’m just so in awe.

I have always enjoyed rooting for underdogs when I don’t have a favorite player or team to support in any given contest. However, I also appreciate excellence. I love seeing Tiger dominate so thoroughly just as I want to see The Patriots win the Super Bowl and have the perfect season. I’d be happy to watch Tiger win every tournament he plays this year (and he sure looks like he could pull that off).

It just seems impossible for anyone to be so consistently good at a game with so many intricacies that he outplays his peers every time. It’s to the point that he doesn’t really have peers. He’s in a flight all his own. For anyone who has ever played this crazy game, Tiger’s performance is beyond impressive to the point that it’s almost unbelievable.

I contend that the difference between him and every other golfer in the world is purely mental. Any one of those guys on Tour can train with coaches, work hard and perfect their swings so they can execute most of the time. The difference is maintaining the mental state to execute it more frequently. And keep maintaining it on the putting green. Hole after hole, round after round, tournament after tournament. Only Tiger has shown he can do that.

Is it in our genes?

I have the ability to focus at times, but I know my nature and how easily distracted I can be. There’s only so much “zone” my brain will allow. So, is the ability to have that kind of mental game in our DNA? I think so. Oh, we can work on it and train our minds and improve, but I think our potential in this capacity is hardwired. The thing is, we don’t know what we’re capable of so we can just keep pushing and trying. And when we hit a wall, we can go get new equipment because there must be something else going on. (If we “upgrade” from the latest driver to the greatest driver and it helps, it’s probably a placebo effect anyway.) Oh, don’t you love this game?

Demonstrating how the USGA can play all the games it wants and it won’t bother him, Tiger recently commented on the meaninglessness of par (I agree). Talking about how the USGA makes changes to par for certain holes and tournaments, he said:

“The USGA just thrives on that … Par is just a number. What I mean by that is that Pebble could set up for a 72, and I would have been what, 16-under par? So under par doesn’t really matter that much. It’s just going out there and shooting a number.”

It’s just going out there and shooting a number, people! Sure, mine’s (way) above par and his is below. Eh… Par, shmar.

Anyway, I have to wonder what goes on in Tiger’s mind during a round. Not par. Not comments from wishful rivals. Is it the number? Certain swing thoughts? Is it like a chamber of silence?

Is it possible to be hyperbolic when discussing Tiger?

Is Tiger approaching a singularity to transcend even his own biological limitations? Someday, will there be a chip we can install in our brains that will allow us to do the same? Am I totally geeking out right now? Will I ever be able to write anything besides a question again? Is it time for a martini?

Tiger Woods Can’t Lose

I think it’s clear that Tiger Woods is unstoppable, at least for the foreseeable future.

His remarkable combination of talent, drive and passion surpasses that of any other golfer in the world. As if that weren’t enough, it seems he has something else going for him as well. This month and this year, especially. According to one interpretation, anyway.

Starting today, Tiger has a powerful force in his corner. Just what the rest of the field needs, right? Here are some excerpts:

Tiger Woods Laughing Capricorn

Your January Horoscope by Susan Miller Capricorn (December 22 – January 19)

“The year 2008 is just made for you!”

“Pluto is about to make a stunning move out of Sagittarius and into Capricorn on January 25” … “Pluto has the slowest orbit around the Sun and therefore spends the longest time in each sign and house of the zodiac. That allows Pluto to make a truly indelible impression as it travels through a house – in your case, your 1st house of personality and personal desires, determination, and dreams.”

“Others will admire your single-minded determination to succeed, for surely, Pluto will require an all-or-nothing approach from you. As a Capricorn, your motivation and ambition to succeed has always been high, but now it is about to become sharpened, focused, and intensified. Your ability to persuade others will become more effective too, for you won’t take “no” for an answer!” (emphasis mine)

“Were you born on December 28 or close to this date? You actually are in a perfect position to reap benefits galore.” (Tiger’s birthday is December 30.)

Did you notice the part about Pluto – I thought Pluto wasn’t a planet anymore – entering Capricorn today? Tiger shot a -7 (65) today at the Buick Invitational to take a 4 shot lead into the weekend at Torrey Pines.

Regardless of your opinion on horoscopes, there is no debating Tiger’s dominance in golf. Personally, I enjoy believing (the positive parts of) my horoscope. I find it fun. And as a Capricorn myself (January 4), I share Tiger’s stellar forecast and can tell you that my year is getting off to a fantastic and fortunate start! Now if only my golf game would show it.


Next post
.

People (still) assume female golfers are lesbians

Random acquaintance: I heard you play golf?Gay symbols

Golf Chick: You heard right.

Random acquaintance: But you’re not gay!

Golf Chick: It’s a “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy these days. Shhh.

Random acquaintance: Really?

Golf Chick: *eye roll*

And so it goes. The stereotype of female golfers being lesbians is alive and well. At least among non-golfers and people who don’t really follow the sport. But who really cares about them?:

Golf Chick: You know, the vast majority of professional female golfers are heterosexual. Can you even name a single gay player?

Random acquaintance: How about Billie Jean King?

See what I mean?

It’s no secret that there have been several gay players on the LPGA over the years. I suspect there are several gay players on the PGA Tour as well, though I couldn’t name a single one. If “a few good men” came out to the public, would that build a stereotype of male golfers being gay? Yeah, right. Football, with all its contact and soft core porn sequences couldn’t even sustain that image if a star player or two actually ever came out.

Let’s get serious

Sadly, being gay is still a stigma for professional male athletes. Hell, I think it’s still a stigma for any male, especially with such macho (and purportedly straight) athletic role models, whether or not the gay man actually looks up to them.

Is it still a stigma for women?

That’s difficult for me to answer. I can’t know what it feels like to be a lesbian or whether or not people judge you because of it. I imagine there is still plenty of that going on.

However, I think there is an element of acceptance due to a sexualized society. Guys like the idea of two women together. As long as they’re pretty, of course. And there are plenty of insecure pretty girls who crave the attention of men so much that they will alter their behavior, their actions, their bodies, and their sexual orientation to get it and therefore can’t really be judgmental of lesbians. But that’s qualified tolerance, not acceptance. Personally, I hate that the word “tolerance” is used to describe freedom from bigotry. Who wants to be tolerated?

I think openly gay women are secure with themselves and, while they might appreciate universal acceptance, don’t need it. Just like secure straight women don’t care if they’re assumed to be gay just because they play golf. I know I don’t.

Back to the lighthearted fun

I recently discussed this topic with my friend, Wendy Dexter, who specifically asked to be fully named when I told her I would write about it. She’s a whack-job free-spirited, outspoken, fun character and I love hanging around her. She does not play golf. She does not watch or follow professional golf. Just the perspective I sought.

First, Wendy said she assumed all female golfers were lesbians and that I was the exception.

Then, after more discussion and her giving it more thought, she said she guessed not all female amateurs could be gay, but that she was still certain the pros must be. And that the better amateurs probably are, too. Whaaaa? Then the conversation went something like this (though it wasn’t nearly this streamlined):

Golf Chick: So, the better the golfer, the greater the likelihood she is gay?

Wendy: Exactly.

Golf Chick: Can you be good and not be gay?

Wendy: Probably not. Wait, but you’re not bad, right?

Golf Chick: Only compared to some. So, will you become gay if you improve to a certain level?

Wendy: No, I guess not. But you probably won’t improve that much if you’re not gay.

*another round of drinks is delivered*

Golf Chick: Do you have to be good to be gay?

Wendy: Are we in a “Sex and the City” episode? That sounded like a Carrie question. I can just see you typing this up and then comes the voice over: “Do you have to be good to be gay?” Or “gay to be good?” Whichever, I think you do.

Golf Chick: Can you be gay and be bad at golf?

Wendy: Hmm… probably, you just have a better shot at being good than if you were straight.

Golf Chick: Do you have to be born gay or can you choose it in order to improve your game?

Wendy: Would you?

Golf Chick: If you weren’t f—ing with me and this had any merit, I might really consider it. Greg would probably understand.

But she was only halfway f—ing with me. She actually does assume that female pro golfers are all gay. And, she claims that belief is the majority opinion in the non-golfing community. I tend to believe her because she has more friends and connections in reality than a lot of teens do on Facebook. She’s got the pulse of the community, one could say. I assumed but neglected to ask if that majority opinion includes gay non-golfers. Note to self to follow up.

I went on to explain the current atmosphere of the LPGA Tour and how most of the top players are straight, and that some of them are even adored for their looks, sexy or wholesome.

Wendy was flabbergasted.

For the record, I’m pretty sure Wendy is straight. Though I wouldn’t be surprised if she gave women a try just to be sure. And while the stereotype may have a negative connotation for many believers, it doesn’t for Wendy. She loves everyone.

Next post.

I can’t even beat Annika in my dreams!

I often dream about golf. Don’t we all?

Last night’s dream was exhilarating and frustrating at the same time. Apparently, I’m an underachiever when I’m sleeping.

The first part was imaginative and ambitious in that I was a good enough golfer to even be competing with Annika Sorenstam in the first place. I wasn’t a pro, but we were playing against each other in some kind of exhibition match.

We were down to the 18th hole and I had a real chance to win. Annika was already on the green (ha – I guess I outdrove her) so I needed to stick one close. My approach shot went long and ended up in a really tricky lie in a strange tuft of grass behind the green. I didn’t have any bunkers to deal with and I had plenty of green to use, but the lie was unpredictable. I needed to hole it out to secure a win or put it in tap-in distance and hope she missed her putt to push a tie-breaker. I ran it by about 15 feet. She missed her first putt and finished off with par. Now I had to make this putt to force the playoff.

Here’s where it gets psychologically interesting.

annika sorenstam waveUp until this point, I had been a fierce competitor and it didn’t matter who my opponent was. Looking at my 15 footer and knowing what it meant, suddenly I started thinking how terrific it was I even had a chance to beat the Amazing Annika and how it would be great even if I only came close. Sure enough, I only came close. I missed the putt and lost. Funny thing was, I didn’t care. I had convinced myself that losing to Annika by one stroke was a great accomplishment.

When I woke up I was terribly disappointed in myself for letting my mind concede and not winning. Go figure.

But thanks for the game, Annika.

Next post.

Marijuana is a performance enhancer? In golf? Really?

When the LPGA Tour begins its random drug testing next year, one of the substances they’ll be looking for is regular old herb – mary-jane – pot – weed – motivation – whatever you want to call it. I think I’m going to start calling it cannabinoid (’cause it’s fun to say). It’s number 7 on the list:

pot leaf

7. Cannabinoids

The LPGA prohibits the use of cannabinoids (e.g. marijuana), which are considered to be performance enhancing when administered to induce a perceived calming effect.

Okay, let’s see here…

First of all, what if a “perceived calming effect” isn’t why it’s – ahem – administered?

Second, I don’t know about you but I’ve witnessed golfers hitting the pipe on the course (this is Southern California after all) and the effect may indeed be calming but certainly not performance-enhancing. I’m sure a “calming effect” is much more important at that level of competition than to the recreational smoker golfer, but it seems to me that it would hurt more than it would help.

Based on my… research… a better reason to ban cannabinoids on tour is to prevent slow play. Seriously. Ever seen a stoned golfer deliberate over a putt?

Hall of Famer Se Ri Pak’s got a new bag – and notes from ADT championship

Don’t let the headline scare you. She’s not leaving golf, she literally has a new bag.

Her caddie, TJ, is blogging all week about Se Ri in the ADT championship. He talks about her superstitious nature, who they like to be paired with and yes, her new Hall of Fame bag. What he doesn’t mention is who made the bag. If it’s the same one I think it is, it’s this beautiful design by keri golf:

Se Ri Pak's hall of fame bag

This bag was custom made for Se Ri (to her specs) to be permanently placed in her Hall of Fame collection in Florida. keri golf even knows how to make baby-poo-yellow (apparently it’s called golden age leather and is the color of the season) look good. The thing has logos all over it, including that interesting one on the side which represents her sister Yoo Ri’s apparel company. TJ’s blog says the bag is “whiter than I am” and I don’t get his meaning if this is the bag. It’s certainly not white. So, I’m not sure if this is it, but he describes the logos and the enormous size and says it’ll go in the hall of fame after they finish with it this week. Those things all sound like the keri golf bag.

I don’t have a keri golf bag – YET. They’ve got really cute styles and I look forward to seeing what comes out for next year.

ADT Championship – coverage and results from round 1

The richest purse of the year for these ladies – $1,550,000 with $1 million going to the winner and all we get are 2 hours of coverage a day with 3 hours on Sunday. I blooped through the whopping 2 hours and didn’t see a glimpse of Se Ri (she finished +5 today), so maybe she’ll make a move tomorrow and we’ll get to see her. She’s got her work cut out for her, but anything can happen. It looks like the Golf Channel (under LPGA’s production oversight) is only showing the top 16 players during their limited coverage.

I did see that Christina Kim (another keri golf staff player) finished well (at -5 to take the lead) and then Lorena Ochoa made her move. Lorena had herself to -6 when she took a quadruple bogey (!) on a par 3. Wow, she does make mistakes! Two on the same hole, in fact. Gotta watch that wind, Lorena. Sadly, last year’s winner, the adorable Julieta Granada, didn’t make the cut to even play in this tournament. Paula Creamer’s also up there towards the head of the pack but all that really matters is for players to stay in the top 16 for the first cut. Here’s where they all stand after today’s round:

ADT 2007 Round 1 leaderboard

Annika’s effort

Meanwhile, Annika Sorenstam is going to the gym to get out her frustration from today. How do I know that? She said so in her new blog after today’s round.

/soapbox on

In an interview with Christina Kim after her round, when asked how she’d spend the $1 million if she won, she joked about using it to become a 6’4″ size 4 blonde. At least I hope it was a joke. Christina, when talking about what’s important to you, don’t forget you’re a role model. If you really feel pressure to look like that, wouldn’t you hope that pressure would diminish for future generations? Quotes like that coming from a successful woman like yourself are counter-productive. /soapbox off

Next post.

Older posts Newer posts

© 2024 The Golfchick

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑